#85941: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Smrtí nikoho žádná skutečná svoboda ve své podstatě nikdy vznikn 

 Zase jenom lžeš...

Evropský soud pro lidská práva v roce 2014 vynesl naprosto senzační nález! RUSKO NENESE ODPOVĚDNOST ZA VRAŽDU TISÍCŮ POLSKÝCH DŮSTOJNÍKŮ V KATYNI! Přelomový rozsudek přepsal historii.  „Dokumenty“, předložené za Gorbačova a Jelcina, svědčící o tom, že z popravy desítek tisíc polských důstojníků je vinen Stalin a sovětská strana, shledal soud podvrhem. Je to skutečně senzační rozsudek. Znamená to, že za posledních 20 let se ruské vedení neustále kálo za zločin, kterého se ve 40 letech dopustil někdo docela jiný. Někdo z okolí prezidenta Gorbačova měl potřebu zkompromitovat ruské dějiny i samotného Stalina. Co je ale ještě důležitější, že bylo třeba, aby k tomu došlo těsně před rozpadem Sovětského svazu.“

#85944: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Smrtí nikoho žádná skutečná svoboda ve své podstatě nikdy vz 

 To, že RT z tohoto udělá, že Rusové nic nespáchali, je sice očekávatelné od bulváru typu RT, ale také to nemá nic společného s realitou. 

Soud řekl, že to nemůže projednat, protože ruská strana nespolupracuje. Nikoliv, že by za masakr v Katyni nebyli rusové odpovědni.  

Tady přímo rozsudek.  Řekl bych, že byste vaší propagandě už ty jejich bláboly mohl přestat věřit. 

Tady citace z rozsudku:

"

38. On 13 April 1990, during a visit by Polish President Wojciech Jaruzelski to Moscow, the President of the USSR, Mikhail Gorbachev, handed over to him the documents concerning the Katyn massacre. The official news agency of the USSR published a communiqué which affirmed, on the basis of newly disclosed archive materials, that “Beria, Merkulov and their subordinates bore direct responsibility for the crime committed in the Katyn Forest”.

39. On 22 March 1990 the Kharkov regional prosecutor’s office opened a criminal investigation into the origin of mass graves found in the city’s Lesopark district. On 6 June 1990 the Kalinin (Tver) prosecutor’s office instituted a criminal case into “the disappearance” (исчезновение) in May 1940 of the Polish prisoners of war who had been held in the NKVD camp in Ostashkov. On 27 September 1990 the Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office of the USSR took over the Kharkov investigation under the number 159 and assigned it to a group of military prosecutors.

40. In the summer and autumn of 1991, Polish and Russian specialists carried out exhumations of corpses at the mass burial sites in Kharkov, Mednoye and Katyn. They also reviewed the archive documents relating to the Katyn massacre, interviewed at least forty witnesses and commissioned forensic examinations.

41. On 14 October 1992 the Russian President Boris Yeltsin revealed that the Polish officers had been sentenced to death by Stalin and the Politburo of the USSR Communist Party. The director of the Russian State Archives transferred to the Polish authorities a number of documents, including the decision of 5 March 1940. During an official visit to Poland on 25 August 1993, President Yeltsin paid tribute to the victims in front of the Katyn Cross in Warsaw.

42. In late May 1995 prosecutors from Belarus, Poland, Russia and Ukraine held a working meeting in Warsaw during which they reviewed the progress of the investigation in case no. 159. The participants agreed that the Russian prosecutors would ask their Belarusian and Ukrainian counterparts for legal assistance to determine the circumstances of the execution of 7,305 Polish citizens in 1940.

43. On 13 May 1997 the Belarusian authorities informed their Russian counterparts that they had not been able to uncover any documents relating to the execution of Polish prisoners of war in 1940. In 2002 the Ukrainian authorities produced documents concerning the transfer of Polish prisoners from the Starobelsk camp to the NKVD prison in the Kharkov region.

44. In 2001, 2002 and 2004 the President of the Polish Institute for National Remembrance (“the INR”) repeatedly but unsuccessfully contacted the Russian Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office with a view to obtaining access to the investigation files.

45. On 21 September 2004 the Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office decided to discontinue criminal case no. 159, apparently on the ground that the persons allegedly responsible for the crime had already died. On 22 December 2004 the Inter-Agency Commission for the Protection of State Secrets classified thirty-six volumes of the case file – out of a total of 183 volumes – as “top secret” and a further eight volumes as “for internal use only”. The decision to discontinue the investigation was given “top secret” classification and its existence was only revealed on 11 March 2005 at a press conference given by the Chief Military Prosecutor.

46. Further to a request from the Court for a copy of the decision of 21 September 2004, the Russian Government refused to produce it, citing its secret classification. It transpired from the Government’s submissions that the investigation had been discontinued on the basis of Article 24 § 4 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, on account of the suspects’ death.

47. From 9 to 21 October 2005 three prosecutors from the INR conducting the investigation into the Katyn massacre and the chief specialist of the Central Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation visited Moscow at the invitation of the Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office. They examined the sixty-seven volumes of case no. 159 which were not classified, but were not allowed to make any copies.

48. On 8 May 2010 the Russian President Dmitry Medvedev provided the Speaker of the Polish Parliament with sixty-seven volumes of the Katyn investigation files. In total, according to the information submitted by the Polish Government, the Russian authorities handed over to them certified copies of 148 volumes, containing approximately 45,000 pages."

#85944: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Smrtí nikoho žádná skutečná svoboda ve své podstatě nikdy vz 

 "106. Applying those requirements to the case at hand, the Chamber found that the mass murder of Polish prisoners by the Soviet secret police had the features of a war crime"

Velmi jsem se poučíl, při čtení rozsudku, který jak jistě velmi dobře víte potvrzuje, že zavraždění tisící! polských důstojníků ruskými komunistickými zločinci. 

#85944: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Smrtí nikoho žádná skutečná svoboda ve své podstatě nikdy vz 

 Velmi zajímavá část rozsudku - je potřeba, abyste se mi omluvil. 

The applicants maintained that the Katyn massacre was a crime under international law. The Polish soldiers captured by the Red Army had been entitled to the full protection guaranteed to prisoners of war, including the protection against acts of violence and cruelty afforded by the provisions of the 1907 Hague Convention (IV) and the Geneva Convention of 1929. The murder of Polish prisoners of war in 1940 had been an unlawful act which violated Articles 4, 23 (c) and 50 of the 1907 Hague Convention (IV) and Articles 2, 46, 61 and 63 of the Geneva Convention of 1929. Even though the USSR had not been a party to either Convention, it had a duty to respect the universally binding principles of international customary law, which had merely been codified in those Conventions. That such an obligation was recognised as legally binding by the USSR was clearly evidenced by the fact that, at the Nuremberg trial, the Soviet prosecutor had attempted to charge the Nazi leaders with the murder of Polish prisoners of war. The extermination of Polish prisoners of war was a war crime within the meaning of Article 6 (b) of the Nuremberg Charter and the shooting of civilians amounted to a crime against humanity as defined in Article 6 (c) of the Nuremberg Charter. The Nuremberg Tribunal’s classification of the Katyn massacre as a war crime had to be viewed in objective terms and was not dependent upon who had actually committed the atrocity. Moreover, the execution of prisoners of war constituted and was treated as a war crime by the international community, a fact convincingly demonstrated by the abundant case-law from the post‑war trials of war criminals. As a crime under international law, the Katyn massacre had been imprescriptible at the time of its commission, as it was today, and the concomitant duty to investigate it survived to this day.

#85944: - Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Smrtí nikoho žádná skutečná svoboda ve své podstatě nikdy vz 

 Liší se dnes Putinovské Rusko od Stalinistického Ruska? 

"Firstly, the Council of Europe and the Convention had come into being as democratic political and legal alternatives to the violations of human dignity committed on a massive scale by two totalitarian regimes, namely Nazism and Stalinism. The Katyn massacre had been carried out by a totalitarian regime whose aims and values radically contradicted those of the Convention."